---
title: "DHH on X: \"NIH: Not Invented Here Syndrome might come from a g..."
description: "!https://x.com/dhh/status/1928450457262850053"
date: 2025-05-31
published: true
tags:
  - dev
  - thought
template: link
---


<div class="embed-card embed-card-external">
  <a href="https://x.com/dhh/status/1928450457262850053" class="embed-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
    <div class="embed-card-image">
      <img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/amplify_video_thumb/1928450369174040576/img/Ec153NtuW0XEoys6.jpg" alt="DHH (@dhh) on X — NIH: Not Invented Here Syndrome might come from a good place, but almost everything that&#39;s good in this world came from people who ignored it. Virtually everything is a variation of something else. Everything can be done better." loading="lazy">
    </div>
    <div class="embed-card-content">
      <div class="embed-card-title">DHH (@dhh) on X</div>
      <div class="embed-card-description">NIH: Not Invented Here Syndrome might come from a good place, but almost everything that&#39;s good in this world came from people who ignored it. Virtually everything is a variation of something else....</div>
      <div class="embed-card-meta">X (formerly Twitter) &middot; x.com</div>
    </div>
  </a>
</div>


I suffer hard from NIH, I'm cheap, I like building things, I hate reading the docs, the perfect recipe for some bad NIH.  I really like DHH's take here.  If no one builds anything new we get stuck with the same old shit.  I think theres a lot of things that as far as my use case is concerned feature complete and needs no more.  I would just build with it or on it, but not re-invent.  It's a slippery slope.
